" Illegibility is not only a thorough, valuable study of Blanchot's relation to Hegel, but also helps to clarify in a new and convincingly argued way how exactly Blanchot thought about writing, and how his thought was operative in his writing." -- SubStance: A Review of Theory and Literary Criticism "[Allen's] work offers a forceful corrective to the simplifications or even outright parodies of Hegel one sometimes finds in work on Blanchot and many of his fellow-travellers in twentieth-century French literary philosophy . Allen's book is unlikely to be surpassed as a philosophically robust and clearsighted guide to the entretien infini between Hegel and Blanchot, philosophy and literature, and negation and negativity." -- Hegel Bulletin "How does one approach a written work that problematizes the regulative ideal of a legible book? This question is associated with Derrida's deconstruction of Hegel. As William S. Allen demonstrates in this fascinating study, it was posed in a unique way by Blanchot, whose own engagements with Hegel invite us to rethink the relation between the terms différance and aufheben ." -- Andrew Cutrofello, Professor of Philosophy, Loyola University Chicago, USA " Illegibility: Blanchot and Hegel applies near-exhaustive knowledge, and laser-like insights, to develop a reading of Hegel through Blanchot, with judicious reference to other thinkers such as Derrida. Hegel stands as a figure for a type of double, even dialectical reflection, in which Blanchot found inspiration even as he challenged and rewrote the Enlightenment philosopher's thinking.

Allen's profound and sustained analysis, based on careful attention to texts, represents what the humanities is best able to do, and he proceeds by means of a nonetheless rigorous scientificity that should be the gold standard for researchers in any field." -- David Wills, Professor of French Studies and Director of Graduate Studies, Brown University, USA.