Summary of Contents JUDICIAL REVIEW HANDBOOK: A DETAILED GUIDE TO THE LAW AND PRACTICE A. THE NATURE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW: keys to understanding what the Court is doing P1 A constitutional guarantee P2 Supervisory jurisdiction P3 Procedural rigour & flexibility P4 Materiality P5 Targets P6 Sources P7 Constitutional fundamentals P8 EU law P9 The HRA P10 Candour & cooperation P11 Precedent & authority P12 Reviewing primary legislation P13 Judicial restraint P14 Critical balance P15 The forbidden method P16 Hard-edged questions P17 Evidence & fact P18 Costs P19 The claim stage P20 Interim relief P21 The permission stage P22 The substantive stage P23 Appeal P24 Remedies P25 Monetary remedies B. PARAMETERS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW: further dominant themes shaping the law and practice P26 Delay P27 Public/private law P28 Ouster P29 Interpretation P30 Function P31 Context P32 Modified review P33 Flux P34 Reviewability/non-reviewability P35 Principle of legality P36 Alternative remedy P37 Proportionality method P38 Standing P39 Discretion/duty P40 Inalienability P41 Legitimate expectation P42 Onus P43 Severance P44 Nullity C. GROUNDS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW: public law wrongs justifying the Court's intervention P45 Classifying grounds P46 Ultra vires P47 Jurisdictional error P48 Error of law P49 Error of fact P50 Abdication/fetter P51 Insufficient inquiry P52 Bad faith/improper motive P53 Frustrating the legislative purpose P54 Substantive unfairness P55 Consistency/equal treatment P56 Relevancy/irrelevancy P57 Unreasonableness P58 Proportionality P59 HRA violation P60 Constitutionality P61 Procedural unfairness P62 Consultation P63 Bias P64 Reasons P65 External vitiation.