Advance Praise for On Account of Race "Lucid legal history . Sketches the contours and ramifications of each case skillfully, boldly critiquing the legal reasoning behind the majority opinions. This well-sourced and accessible account makes a convincing case that America''s highest court played a key role in stalling black progress for a century." -- Publishers Weekly "An expert on constitutional law skewers the U.S. Supreme Court for its failure to strike down practices that disenfranchise black citizens . A persuasive case that history matters and that the past is prologue." -- Kirkus Reviews "A thought-provoking book about some of the tragic twists and turns of race in the Supreme Court post-Civil War.

This is a significant conversation." --Jay Winik, bestselling author of April 1865 and 1944 "In a book both reasonable and readable, Lawrence Goldstone effectively challenges the convenient mythology that racial segregation was a policy reflecting merely the isolated prejudices of the southern American states in the post-Civil War era. His main focus is the U.S. Supreme Court and the peculiar, absurdly twisted logic across a series of critical cases by which the justices undermined the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments, systematically legitimating Jim Crow. The lesson is clear: that voting and other basic rights, unless broadly defended, can rest on fragile foundations indeed." --Ronald King, professor of political science at San Diego State University and coauthor of Removal of the Property Qualification for Voting in the United States "No right is more important than the vote. Yet in this engaging and highly readable book, Lawrence Goldstone shows how the Supreme Court, the supposed guardian of our fundamental rights, has repeatedly failed to protect this right for the most vulnerable Americans.

With an eye for detail and irony, Goldstone uncovers the dramatic stories behind the cases in which the Court left racial minorities to fend for themselves in a hostile democracy." --Adam Winkler, professor at UCLA School of Law and National Book Award finalist for We the Corporations "Understanding that the right to vote is the guardian of other rights we possess, On Account of Race: The Supreme Court, White Supremacy, and the Ravaging of African American Voting Rights skillfully and with measured patience, deep insight, and extraordinary attention to primary source evidence charts the course of the United States Supreme Court''s abandonment of African American Fifteenth Amendment voting rights and Fourteenth Amendment equality under the law civil rights. In a compelling manner, Goldstone lays bare the glaring and in many instances jarring evidence of the brutal physical suppression of African Americans in the post-Civil War South by white "Redeemers," and the High Court''s serendipitous avoidance of the evidence of sustained discrimination against especially African Americans seeking to use their civil and voting rights. Goldstone''s meticulous research brings forward the numerous cases brought before the Court by African American litigants seeking redress, even as he demonstrates persuasively that African Americans had no ally in the High Court as they and the relatively small numbers of whites who supported them sought to realize the equality promised them by Reconstruction Era amendments to the nation''s Constitution. Simply put, for nearly one hundred years following the Reconstruction Era''s goal of biracial democracy in the South, the High Court used its jurisprudence to give sanction to the white supremacy that eviscerated African American civil rights and voting rights. Further, Goldstone notes that African American voter suppression by the proponents of white supremacy is with us again. White supremacy advocates have long sought to weaken or destroy the enforcement preclearance (Sections 2 and 5) provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as those were the oversight mechanisms that ensured the ability of racial and ethnic minorities to vote in parts of the country with a deep history of voter suppression. On June 25, 2013, in a 5-4 decision, Shelby County, Alabama v.

Holder , Chief Justice Roberts cast the decisive vote in the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that allowed states and localities to change their election laws without federal Department of Justice preclearance. Since then, under various ruses, rigging election systems and promoting voter suppression have been thwarting the right to vote and once again promoting white supremacy that is chipping away at our democracy." --Marsha J. Tyson Darling, PhD, director of African, Black and Caribbean studies at Adelphi University and editor of Race, Voting, Redistricting and the Constitution "Lawrence Goldstone''s book On Account of Race is a careful and brilliant analysis of the effort of the Southern states to deprive the African American population of the right to vote after Reconstruction ended in 1877. There was no disguise of their purpose and no restriction on the method they used. From the grandfather clause or poll taxes or literacy tests, whatever could be used to block African Americans from voting was openly and emphatically applied.

The white population was simply determined to keep the ballot box for themselves. Goldstone shows how the courts refused to interfere in any way with this program. Even such noteworthy judges as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes approved the effort. The book carefully examines the campaign, which lasted almost one hundred years until the Voting Rights Act of 1965." --Leon Friedman, Joseph Kushner Distinguished Professor of Civil Liberties Law at Hofstra University Praise for Inherently Unequal "Goldstone offers a clear, cogent reading of the court''s machinations, no small accomplishment since the justices generally rested their opinions on convoluted legal reasoning rather than on broad principles. And he''s completely convincing when he argues that behind those carefully parsed opinions lay a deep-seated racism strengthened by the justices'' embrace of Social Darwinism." -- The Washington Post "Convincingly lays the blame for this tragedy of Jim Crow at the door of the institution that could have made the difference but did not: the United States Supreme Court." -- Los Angeles Times "In this comprehensive and remarkably lucid study of post-Civil War Supreme Court decisions, Goldstone shows how the court''s narrow interpretation of the 14th amendment--bestowing ''equal protection under the law'' to all Americans, regardless of race--paved the way for future decisions that diminished the status of African-Americans.

" -- Publishers Weekly "An absorbing account of the Supreme Court''s role following the Civil War." -- Library Journal "A furious indictment of the Supreme Court as an accessory to the anti-democratic machinations of Gilded Age elites." -- Kirkus Reviews "One of the saddest episodes in American history has been inadequately explored and poorly understood--until now. Lawrence Goldstone''s brilliantly written book, Inherently Unequal , traces the post-Reconstruction Supreme Court''s slow strangulation of equal rights for African-Americans. It will be a shock to many that the judicial branch, viewed in the modern context as the premier defender of civil rights, was primarily responsible for the nation''s descent into a deep, racist inequality that ruined the lives of millions for a century. As Goldstone shows us, Lincoln''s great legacy was cynically dismantled by the officeholders best positioned to protect it." --Larry J. Sabato, Director, Center for Politics, University of Virginia, and author of A More Perfect Constitution "The great puzzle of nineteenth-century American history is why the North waded through blood and gore to free the slaves during the Civil War, only to allow them to be stripped of their civil rights and subject to relentless terror after.

Lawrence Goldstone does a brilliant job of showing how the Supreme Court led the way by interpreting the Constitution so as to legalize what was little better than neo-slavery. Inherently Unequal is a valuable corrective for anyone who still believes that judges are above politics or that the Constitution is a clear-cut charter of liberty." --Daniel Lazare, author of The Frozen Republic Praise for Dark Bargain: Slavery, Profits, and the Struggle for the Constitution "Mr. Goldstone shows the specter of slavery lurking behind so many of the delegates'' disputes. He describes the lengths to which these wily debaters would go to make their motives sound nobler than they were and the men themselves freer of the racism of their day than in fact they were." -- The Wall Street Journal "[A] thoughtful new study of the framing of the Constitution and of the compromise over the role of slavery in the composition of the new government." -- Philadelphia Inquirer "Dark Bargain is a long-overdue corrective . With sound research and a lively style, Goldstone shows there was no such thing as a single ''original intent.

'' that he does so in such a robust, entertaining and accessible style is an advantage that even the Constitution''s drafters would have appreciated."-- The Denver Post "Mr. Goldstone does not evince any political purpose in this book. But when we see the founders as ordinary men (or worse, ordinary politicians), we can readily see how absurd it is when judges claim to discover, in the brief text of the Constitution, a moral right to abortion or sodomy, an injunction against creches on public property or new rules for professional golf. Today, the Constitution is little read but widely venerated. Dark Bargain makes the docu.