The manuscript of the AqwÄl QatÄda has repeatedly attracted particular interest among modern scholars, as it raises questions concerning the early development of the IbÄá¸Ä« Basran community and the emergence of Islamic jurisprudence in Iraq. It is a unique document because it attests to the existence of a scholarly link between SunnÄ«s and IbÄá¸Ä«s during the early development of Islamic law. The fact that the legal responsa and traditions of QatÄda b. DaÊ¿ama al-Sadusi (60/680-117/735) are part of an IbÄá¸Ä« collection, in which the traditions of IbÄá¸Ä« Imam JÄbir b. Zayd (d.93/ 711) have been transmitted through Ê¿Amr b. Harim and Ê¿Amr b. DÄ«nÄr, proves that the IbÄá¸Ä« lawyers of the first generations considered QatÄda to be a faithful upholder of JÄbir's doctrine.
Given the lack of material available for JÄbir , instructions must have been given to collect whatever was transmitted through QatÄda. QatÄda's legal responsa must have corresponded to those of the first IbÄá¸Ä« authorities, thereby explaining why the collator of the AqwÄl QatÄda (probably AbÅ« GhÄnim al-KhurÄsÄnÄ«, who lived between the end of the 2nd/8th century and the first decades of the 3rd/9th century) included them in an IbÄá¸Ä« manuscript. This affinity is attested by brief annotations at the foot of QatÄda's traditions and legal responses where the collator emphasises the fact that QatÄda's opinion coincides with those of an IbÄá¸Ä« authority (al-RabÄ«, AbÅ« Ubayda, JÄbir). AbÅ« GhÄnim probably related the AqwÄl from al-RabÄ« b. ḤabÄ«b, as proved by the expression wa-ḥaddathanÄ« bi-hÄdhÄ al-RabÄ«, which we find on occasion in the manuscripts. This explains why the AqwÄl preserves also responsa from al-RabÄ« (in sections II, III, and IV) and traditions related by al-RabÄ« from AbÅ« Ubayda and JÄbir (mainly in sections I and II).