Introduction, Ross D. Inman (Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, USA) Part I: A Thomistic Account of Divine Simplicity, W. Matthews Grant ( University of St. Thomas, USA) 1. An Anselmian Response: Katherin Rogers (University of Delaware, USA) 2. A Scotistic Response: Joshua Blander (The Kings College, New York, USA) 3. A Parsimonious Response: Oliver Crisp (University of St. Andrews, UK) 4.
A Critical Response: R.T. Mullins (Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, Finland) 5. Response: W. Matthews Grant (University of St. Thomas, USA) Part II: An Anselmian Account of Divine Simplicity, Katherin Rogers ( University of Delaware, USA) 6. A Thomistic Response: W. Matthews Grant (University of St.
Thomas, USA) 7. A Scotistic Response: Joshua Blander (The Kings College, New York, USA) 8. A Parsimonious Response: Oliver Crisp (University of St. Andrews, UK) 9. A Critical Response: R.T. Mullins (Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, Finland) 10. Response: Katherin Rogers (University of Delaware, USA) Part III: A Parsimonious Account of Divine Simplicity, Oliver Crisp ( University of St.
Andrews, UK) 11. A Thomistic Response: W. Matthews Grant (University of St. Thomas, USA) 12. An Anselmian Response: Katherin Rogers (University of Delaware, USA) 13. A Scotistic Response: Joshua Blander (The Kings College, New York, USA) 14. A Critical Response: R.T.
Mullins (Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, Finland) 15. Response: Oliver Crisp(University of St. Andrews, UK) Part IV: A Scotistic Account of Divine Simplicity, Joshua Blander ( The Kings College, New York, USA) 16. A Thomistic Response: W. Matthews Grant (University of St. Thomas, USA) 17. An Anselmian Response: Katherin Rogers (University of Delaware, USA) 18. A Parsimonious Response: Oliver Crisp (University of St.
Andrews, UK) 19. A Critical Response: R.T. Mullins (Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, Finland) 20. Response: Joshua Blander (The Kings College, New York, USA) Part V: Against Divine Simplicity, R.T. Mullins (Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, Finland) 21. A Thomistic Response: W.
Matthews Grant (University of St. Thomas, USA) 22. An Anselmian Response: Katherin Rogers (University of Delaware, USA) 23. A Scotistic Response: Joshua Blander (The Kings College, New York, USA) 24. A Parsimonious Response: Oliver Crisp (University of St. Andrews, UK) 25. Response: R.T.
Mullins (Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, Finland) Conclusion Ross D. Inman (Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, USA) Bibliography Index.