Contextualise, contextualise, contextualise! The editors and authors of Imperial Crime and Punishment: Approaches from Historical Criminology remind us why history matters. This collection, in recovering and foregrounding these imperial histories of crime and punishment, adds crucial, critical historical dimension to calls for greater epistemic expansions in criminology--calls aimed at democratising both what we know and how we know. That this necessarily begins with situating our understanding of punishment's centrality in a longer history of our contemporary arrangement becomes clear with each chapter, in this impressive collection. Contributions broaden knowledge regarding the entrenched role of punishment to our perspectives on peoples and places and our relationship with justice. In that regard, contributors help dispell deeply held illusions of punishment as an uncanny, discrete, and peripheral set of logics and practices safeguarding good people from bad people, and safeguarding social stability from the impositions of those labelled and feared as keen to destabilise it. Indeed, contributors reinforce the understanding that the centrality of punishment (including the synonymity with marginality) is neither an uncanny, nor discrete, nor peripheral, but is instead part of a historically embedded reproduction of logics fundamental to both organising and differentiating access to justice and positive recognition. Contributors explore a cross section of themes in this regard, including the significant role of prisons in community and social construction; the relationship between crime, poverty and welfare; the relationship between surveillance and marginality; and the relationship between relocation and disenfranchisment. As editors Watkins and Bland note, one key objective of the collection is to enable the recovery of lived histories so that scholars and other interested parties can add a critical historical dimension to contemporary (criminological) concerns.