* At a moment when humanity is on the precipice of nuclear catastrophe, philosopher Jean-Pierre Dupuy theorizes the limits of the logics of nuclear deterrence. * Dupuy brings a unique philosophical sensibility not typically found in the American literature on nuclear weapons. * Explores the literature on the effectiveness and ethics of nuclear deterrence to show that it is riddled with contradictions and paradoxes, all of which stem from a confusion between two conceptions of time, what Dupuy refers to as "occurring time" and "projected time" * Dupuy is well-known both in philosophy and nuclear disarmament circles. His unique writing style combines engagement with philosophical and social scientific thinkers like Girard, Luhmann, and Anders with insights gained from his experience in the French state as a risk assessment advisor. * The preface has been updated to address the Ukrainian crisis, which has only made the book more relevant to the current moment of the resurgence of nuclear weapons as an option in global politics. * Its analysis of the developments that took place in the Trump era, which continue to shape the nuclear landscape today, remain extremely relevant. * Ultimately the book shows that theoretically nuclear deterrence can be held to be effective and rational, but one cannot escape the fact that the mere possession of nuclear weapons is an abomination in moral terms. In nuclear studies, deterrence has gotten renewed interest and support--our book shows the limits of those ideas.

* Using his experiences not just as a philosopher, but as a risk-assessment advisor for the French state, Dupuy prompts us to rethink the metaphysical framework that has yielded deterrence theory. * Especially given recent headlines, this book to will be of broad interest and will attract a readership that extends well-beyond those in philosophy.